I have a report that consists of 12 matrixes. In Dev Studio all the data for
all matrixes returns correctly, but when the rdl is on the Report Server and
the Report is run, the 12th ( last ) matrix only displays column group and
row headings, no detail data within the matrix cells. Also from within Dev
Studio when I export the report as a "Web Archive", the "web" page exported
displays incorrectly just like the report does on the report server. Why
does it not display the same as from within Dev Studio?
Thanks in advance.Found an incorrect non-zero value in the groups before row headers property
settings which was causing no data in the detail cells. No further help
needed.
"mike" wrote:
> I have a report that consists of 12 matrixes. In Dev Studio all the data for
> all matrixes returns correctly, but when the rdl is on the Report Server and
> the Report is run, the 12th ( last ) matrix only displays column group and
> row headings, no detail data within the matrix cells. Also from within Dev
> Studio when I export the report as a "Web Archive", the "web" page exported
> displays incorrectly just like the report does on the report server. Why
> does it not display the same as from within Dev Studio?
> Thanks in advance.
Showing posts with label limit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label limit. Show all posts
Monday, March 12, 2012
Friday, February 24, 2012
Is there any limit to Left Join ?
I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
ThanksThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--050208090800080108030302
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Nah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement in SQL
Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM clause in
BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. ;-)
Happy joining!
--
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Peter wrote:
>I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
>I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
>be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
>Thanks
>
--050208090800080108030302
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<tt>Nah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement
in SQL Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM
clause in BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.<br>
<br>
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. <span class="moz-smiley-s3"><span>
;-) </span></span><br>
<br>
Happy joining!</tt><br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<p><span lang="en-au"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">--<br>
</font> </span><b><span lang="en-au"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">mike
hodgson</font></span></b><span lang="en-au"> <font face="Tahoma"
size="2">|</font><i><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> database administrator</font></i><font face="Tahoma" size="2">
| mallesons</font><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2">stephen</font><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> jaques</font><font face="Tahoma"><br>
</font><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">T</font></b><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> +61 (2) 9296 3668 |</font><b><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"> F</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> +61
(2) 9296 3885 |</font><b><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font
face="Tahoma" size="2">M</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> +61
(408) 675 907</font><br>
<b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">E</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">
<a href="http://links.10026.com/?link=mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com">
mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com</a> |</font><b><font
face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma" size="2">W</font></b><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"> <a href="http://links.10026.com/?link=/">http://www.mallesons.com">
http://www.mallesons.com</a></font></span> </p>
</div>
<br>
<br>
Peter wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid0e3f01c51894$b60fc380$a401280a@.phx.gbl" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
Thanks
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--050208090800080108030302--|||"Mike Hodgson" <mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OlTsSgJGFHA.3908@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> but if you stay under 200 joins in a single query you should be OK. ;-)
LOL! I love a well-designed database... :-)
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
ThanksThis is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--050208090800080108030302
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Nah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement in SQL
Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM clause in
BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. ;-)
Happy joining!
--
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Peter wrote:
>I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
>I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
>be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
>Thanks
>
--050208090800080108030302
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<tt>Nah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement
in SQL Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM
clause in BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.<br>
<br>
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. <span class="moz-smiley-s3"><span>
;-) </span></span><br>
<br>
Happy joining!</tt><br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<title></title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<p><span lang="en-au"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">--<br>
</font> </span><b><span lang="en-au"><font face="Tahoma" size="2">mike
hodgson</font></span></b><span lang="en-au"> <font face="Tahoma"
size="2">|</font><i><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> database administrator</font></i><font face="Tahoma" size="2">
| mallesons</font><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2">stephen</font><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> jaques</font><font face="Tahoma"><br>
</font><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">T</font></b><font face="Tahoma"
size="2"> +61 (2) 9296 3668 |</font><b><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"> F</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> +61
(2) 9296 3885 |</font><b><font face="Tahoma"> </font><font
face="Tahoma" size="2">M</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"> +61
(408) 675 907</font><br>
<b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">E</font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2">
<a href="http://links.10026.com/?link=mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com">
mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com</a> |</font><b><font
face="Tahoma"> </font><font face="Tahoma" size="2">W</font></b><font
face="Tahoma" size="2"> <a href="http://links.10026.com/?link=/">http://www.mallesons.com">
http://www.mallesons.com</a></font></span> </p>
</div>
<br>
<br>
Peter wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid0e3f01c51894$b60fc380$a401280a@.phx.gbl" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
Thanks
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--050208090800080108030302--|||"Mike Hodgson" <mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OlTsSgJGFHA.3908@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> but if you stay under 200 joins in a single query you should be OK. ;-)
LOL! I love a well-designed database... :-)
Is there any limit to Left Join ?
I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
Thanks
Nah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement in SQL
Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM clause in
BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. ;-)
Happy joining!
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Peter wrote:
>I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
>I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
>be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
>Thanks
>
|||"Mike Hodgson" <mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OlTsSgJGFHA.3908@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> but if you stay under 200 joins in a single query you should be OK. ;-)
LOL! I love a well-designed database... :-)
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
Thanks
Nah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement in SQL
Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM clause in
BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. ;-)
Happy joining!
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Peter wrote:
>I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
>I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
>be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
>Thanks
>
|||"Mike Hodgson" <mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OlTsSgJGFHA.3908@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> but if you stay under 200 joins in a single query you should be OK. ;-)
LOL! I love a well-designed database... :-)
Is there any limit to Left Join ?
I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
ThanksNah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement in SQL
Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM clause in
BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. ;-)
Happy joining!
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Peter wrote:
>I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
>I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
>be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
>Thanks
>|||"Mike Hodgson" <mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OlTsSgJGFHA.3908@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> but if you stay under 200 joins in a single query you should be OK. ;-)
LOL! I love a well-designed database... :-)
I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
ThanksNah - no practical limit (the maximum tables per SELECT statement in SQL
Server 8.0 is 256). If you look at the grammar for the FROM clause in
BOL you'll see it's a recursive grammar.
If you were to join a couple hundred tables in your FROM clause you'd
probably hit some limits when you started running out of memory in the
procedure cache for your query plan and the CPU ground to a halt trying
to process the mother of all queries but if you stay under 200 joins in
a single query you should be OK. ;-)
Happy joining!
*mike hodgson* |/ database administrator/ | mallesons stephen jaques
*T* +61 (2) 9296 3668 |* F* +61 (2) 9296 3885 |* M* +61 (408) 675 907
*E* mailto:mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com |* W* http://www.mallesons.com
Peter wrote:
>I am going to create a query with more than 1 LEFT JOIN.
>I would like to know is there any limit (Like only 1 can
>be used) in SQL Server 2000 ?
>Thanks
>|||"Mike Hodgson" <mike.hodgson@.mallesons.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:OlTsSgJGFHA.3908@.TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> but if you stay under 200 joins in a single query you should be OK. ;-)
LOL! I love a well-designed database... :-)
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can return?
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
return?No.
And next time please don't re-post your question in every single group.
Asking in ONE group should be sufficient.
Adam Machanic
Pro SQL Server 2005, available now
http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=457
--
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%23fR04M2YGHA.3704@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>
return?No.
And next time please don't re-post your question in every single group.
Asking in ONE group should be sufficient.
Adam Machanic
Pro SQL Server 2005, available now
http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=457
--
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%23fR04M2YGHA.3704@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can return?
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
return?no
Jack Vamvas
___________________________________
Receive free SQL tips - www.ciquery.com/sqlserver.htm
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ewcJ9M2YGHA.508@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>
return?no
Jack Vamvas
___________________________________
Receive free SQL tips - www.ciquery.com/sqlserver.htm
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ewcJ9M2YGHA.508@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can return?
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
return?no
--
Jack Vamvas
___________________________________
Receive free SQL tips - www.ciquery.com/sqlserver.htm
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ewcJ9M2YGHA.508@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>
return?no
--
Jack Vamvas
___________________________________
Receive free SQL tips - www.ciquery.com/sqlserver.htm
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ewcJ9M2YGHA.508@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can return?
is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
return?Only 8000 characters. No more
Nathan H. Omukwenyi
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>|||I don't believe there is a limit other than available memory.
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"Nathan H. Omukwenyi" <nathan@.e-tools.com> wrote in message
news:eXO8V8wZGHA.428@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Only 8000 characters. No more
> Nathan H. Omukwenyi
> "Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>|||I believe the only limitation is the underlying data type in sql. For
example a varchar can only be max 8000 chars. but text could be up to 2
gigs.
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>|||Agreed. I had only tested with the varchar SQL data type. Testing with TEXT
shows that it can handle much more but reaching the maximum is taking too
much time and resources. So I suppose Dan could be right about available
memory.
Nathan H. Omukwenyi
"Jeremy" <nospam@.here.com> wrote in message
news:O5fxDqBaGHA.4752@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I believe the only limitation is the underlying data type in sql. For
> example a varchar can only be max 8000 chars. but text could be up to 2
> gigs.
> "Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
return?Only 8000 characters. No more
Nathan H. Omukwenyi
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>|||I don't believe there is a limit other than available memory.
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"Nathan H. Omukwenyi" <nathan@.e-tools.com> wrote in message
news:eXO8V8wZGHA.428@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
> Only 8000 characters. No more
> Nathan H. Omukwenyi
> "Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>|||I believe the only limitation is the underlying data type in sql. For
example a varchar can only be max 8000 chars. but text could be up to 2
gigs.
"Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> is there any limit to how long of a string SqlDataReader.GetString() can
> return?
>|||Agreed. I had only tested with the varchar SQL data type. Testing with TEXT
shows that it can handle much more but reaching the maximum is taking too
much time and resources. So I suppose Dan could be right about available
memory.
Nathan H. Omukwenyi
"Jeremy" <nospam@.here.com> wrote in message
news:O5fxDqBaGHA.4752@.TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>I believe the only limitation is the underlying data type in sql. For
> example a varchar can only be max 8000 chars. but text could be up to 2
> gigs.
> "Daniel" <softwareengineer98037@.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uTdm7M2YGHA.500@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
Monday, February 20, 2012
Is there an MS SQL Limit function?
MySQL has a convenient syntax for paging data that looks like this:
SELECT * FROM MyTable LIMIT 10, 20
That would select 10 records, starting from record 20, so that it returns records 20 - 30. This is convenient way to page data, without returning anymore rows than than you need.
However, MS SQL doesn't appear to support that syntax. What is the equivalent sql code to select any N rows from an arbitrary starting point, without having to create a stored procedure?
Thanks in advance :)it's a fiasco
SQL Server has the TOP keyword, but it takes only one parameter
see this article -- http://rosca.net/writing/articles/serverside_paging.asp|||How can is start at row 20 when you have not specified an ORDER BY clause?|||How can is start at row 20 when you have not specified an ORDER BY clause?
You can't
Read here
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/category/162.aspx|||http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/category/162.aspxjeepers, i took a look at one of the two articles posted there, and boy, that sql is inefficient
brett, did you read the article i posted?|||Which one? I thought the server side paging was pretty good...|||Andrew's code is very,,,need to compare the 2|||i originally read the second one, and it has issues
i just now went back and read the first one, and all it is is a dynamic-ization of the second one
i remain unimpressed
now, did you read the article i posted?|||Yes I did, and it's elegant...but I'd have to test it for performace against some major tables
SELECT * FROM MyTable LIMIT 10, 20
That would select 10 records, starting from record 20, so that it returns records 20 - 30. This is convenient way to page data, without returning anymore rows than than you need.
However, MS SQL doesn't appear to support that syntax. What is the equivalent sql code to select any N rows from an arbitrary starting point, without having to create a stored procedure?
Thanks in advance :)it's a fiasco
SQL Server has the TOP keyword, but it takes only one parameter
see this article -- http://rosca.net/writing/articles/serverside_paging.asp|||How can is start at row 20 when you have not specified an ORDER BY clause?|||How can is start at row 20 when you have not specified an ORDER BY clause?
You can't
Read here
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/category/162.aspx|||http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/category/162.aspxjeepers, i took a look at one of the two articles posted there, and boy, that sql is inefficient
brett, did you read the article i posted?|||Which one? I thought the server side paging was pretty good...|||Andrew's code is very,,,need to compare the 2|||i originally read the second one, and it has issues
i just now went back and read the first one, and all it is is a dynamic-ization of the second one
i remain unimpressed
now, did you read the article i posted?|||Yes I did, and it's elegant...but I'd have to test it for performace against some major tables
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)